Categories
Rehearsal Journal Uncategorized

Rehearsal: Day 2

Rehearsal Plan:

  1. Business (Review from last rehearsal, overview of what is happening today)
  2. Character bio’s
  3. Brief Chekov review
  4. Meditation
  5. Chekov’s Qualities of Movement
  6. Archetypal Gesture
  7. Psychological Gesture
  8. Meisner

Notes:

  1. Business was really brief today; I just wanted to ask the cast what they had percolated on from last rehearsal.
  2. The character bio’s were phenomenal. Eric and Tom went really deep and came up with a lot of creative, usable material. One aspect I found really interesting about Simian’s bio is that, as a child, he was branded by his older brother on his back. I can’t wait to incorporate that trauma in to Simian’s physicality. Tom had a really excellent backstory about Havilland originally wanting to be an actor and funneling that theatricality into house showing. They both came up with full names for their characters that became really useful later on in rehearsal. I plan on asking both of them to donate their character bio’s to this website.
  3. I used a worksheet given to me by Professor Anjalee Deshpande-Hutchinson during my stint as AD for Radium Girls to review the basics of Chekov. I talked about the 4 brothers, qualities of movement, aspects of physicality, character spheres, tempo, archetypal gesture, and psychological gesture. Today we mainly worked on qualities of movement, archetypal gesture, and psychological gesture. I’m going to scan the worksheet for Tom and Eric to fill in and refer to.
  4. Meditation went really well today! I was much more confident in what I was doing and I think I was much more effective. We also started with a more rigorous stretching routine, and I think I’m going to expand on that next rehearsal. Its really important that they aren’t stiff and I want them to feel aligned while they’re performing.
  5. Qualities of movement had a great start. I had them discover what there own quality was, and then I had them focus on their characters. They learned a lot about how their character naturally moves, but also how they move when they are not at ease. Simian was a radiator, as was Eric. However, Eric’s radiation is very positive and motivating, while Simian’s is quite intrusive and seeks to inflict itself upon other people. Tom is a flyer, as is Havilland. Both of them have a very carefree light movements when comfortable, but Tom discovered that Havilland uses a type of resistant sculpting to disguise himself and deal with hardship.
  6. Tom and Eric took best to Archetypal gesture which made their preliminary psychological gestures very powerful. We found that each character has two archetypal gestures: one for Simian and Havilland and one for Charles and Michael (the given names Eric and Tom chose from Simian and Havilland).  Simian is a penetrate, Charles is a gather, Havilland is a push, and Michael is throw.
  7. From those basic archetypal gestures I asked them to develop more intricate psychological gestures inspired by some of their lines. Eric ended up with a very beautiful penetrate to pull for Simian and pull to gather for Charles. They were stunningly disparate and I’m very excited to see Eric play with these two sides of Simian. Tom’s two psychological gestures were more connected which fits well for Havilland. Both of them have pushes inside of them but Havilland’s more fearful and animalistic with a smash at the end. Michael’s is much more finessed with a pointed throw at the end. I feel like that those gestures define Havilland’s simultaneous victimhood and strength.
  8. After all the physical work, I wanted Tom and Eric to engage with the text and start digging into the intention and meaning of the lines. They did a phenomenal job of discovering new things through meisner-like repetition, and I think they are really beginning to understand the duality of meaning to a lot of the text. I’m starting to see some really creative and organic rhythmic choices and a lot of great vocal variation.

Another fruitful rehearsal!

Eric and Tom,  Psychological Gesture

Categories
Reports From Stage Management Uncategorized

Rehearsal Report: Day 2

Start Time/End Time: 4:00, 7:45

Summary: reviewing character bios, highlighting five crucial points, quality of movement, drawing character’s atmosphere abstractly, height, rhythm, pace, staccato vs legato, psychological gestures with emotions and titles, vocal work with Meisner  

Incidents: NA

Reminders: Keep thinking about movement and psychological gestures

Notes:

 

Categories
Rehearsal Journal

Rehearsal: Day 1

Rehearsal Plan:

  1. Discuss business (scheduling conflicts, general questions, expectations)
  2. Discuss Michael Haneke’s Funny Games
  3. Go over character bios
  4. Meditation
  5. Intro to Animal work
  6. Sculpture work
  7. Misc.

Notes:

  1. Nobody has any scheduling issues except Kate, who has tour guiding training until 6pm tomorrow. I reminded the cast that I expect punctuality (from both themselves and me) and that I want them to do their homework for these characters. I let them know what resources I was going to make available to them, and I encouraged them to do their own character research outside of what I provide for them.
  2. Really amazing discussion on Funny Games. Tom and Eric had a lot of great thoughts about how the movie is similar and dissimilar from the play. Eric mentioned that he wants Dr. Simian to be more sincere than the villains in Funny Games; I completely agree and I’m very happy he is already looking to find depth in these outrageous characters.
  3. Tom and Eric didn’t have their character bios finished, but they mention that they wanted to include more detail and dig deeper into the character’s past. I want to encourage this critical engagement, so I extended their deadline until tomorrow. I also told them to find a secret about their character that they will keep hidden until the rehearsal process is over. I think this will help them round their characters and I plan on using these secrets in object work.
  4. Meditation was good. I tripped over my words in the beginning which probably wasn’t very relaxing, but I pulled it together in the end. The cast was very receptive and I think they got something good out of it.
  5. Animal work could have been better. I assigned Eric a snake, and he told me that he thought a Basilisk would be more appropriate. I like assigning a mythical aspect to Simian so I told him that was fine as long as he knew what qualities of movement, behavior, and sound a Basilisk would have. I gave Tom the kangaroo mouse, which he seemed excited about. However, both Tom and Eric had difficulty going deeper into the physicality of the creature. I think more research will assist this, but if they aren’t connecting to it in the next few rehearsal I may change tactics.
  6. Sculpture work was excellent. I had Tom and Eric sculpture each other into their character based on a random line in the play. This was interesting, but I was absolutely floored when I asked them to sculpt their partner the way their character sees them. Eric sculpted Havilland in a very seductive damsel in distress position, and Tom sculpted Simian in the image of a dashing prince. Then I sculpted them into a very theatrical position that was reminiscent of the cistern chapel fresco, and then I asked them to adjust it into what they found more comfortable and true to character. We had a great discussion afterword about the seductive relationship between Havilland and Simian, which then grew into a deep discussion about the relationship between creator and creation. I’m really excited to explore this power dynamic later on.
  7. I didn’t have anything planned for this section but based on the sculpture work and the revelations that followed, I asked them to perform and improv loosely based on their characters. They engaged in a very dynamic discussion about ownership, art, and abandonment that I can’t wait to expand on.

Overall a very exciting first rehearsal!

Eric and Tom,  Animal Work

Categories
Reports From Stage Management

Rehearsal Report: Day 1

Start Time/End Time: 4:00, 7:20

Summary: Discussed Funny Games , watching violence is engaging, animal work, predator and prey relationships, physicality work, working with sculptures Eric: snake like/ Murph: kangaroo mouse, colors and light, thinking about commonalities the characters share, intimate relationship with your creator (think Frankenstein), the house has addictive qualities

Incidents: Eric got a splinter

Reminders: Character bios, think about a secret

Notes: